Skip to main content

About your Search

20110301
20110331
Search Results 0 to 5 of about 6 (some duplicates have been removed)
and afghanistan back in 2001? "t tesgo o oitwa i rorngonhto y no. first in afghanistan, the cia worked with u.s. military forces on the ground in afghanistan. in libya, the u.s. is still ruling out ground troops. so far in libya, the u.s. is not saying we are doing that. the u.s. is not saying we are arming the rebels, but as i understand it, this presidential finding if it has happened would be the kind of instrument that president obama would use to authorize something like arming the rebels. again, i am not totally clear on what the presidential finding would mean if there is one, and since we don't know for a fact there definitely was one, it is hard to say exactly what its terms are. that's one of the things we are going to try to figure out with michael isikoff from nbc in a moment. what we know about the legality of this, presidential findings have been around for decades, presidents using them for covert operations have to notify the top democrat and republican in the house and senate, as well as top democrat and republican on the intelligence committees in both the house and the senate
covert u.s. government support for rebel leaders. >> the new york times reports small groups of operatives have been working in libya for several weeks. the unknown number of american officers according to times gathering intelligence for air strikes and making contact with rebels. now, does this mean that the cia is in libya as a pseudo military force to topple gadhafi the way the cia participated as a pseudo military force in toppling the taliban in afghanistan back in 2001? the times goes out of its way and is reporting to say no. first the afghanistan worked with military forces on the ground in afghanistan. in libya, the u.s. is still ruling out ground troops. second, in afghanistan, the cia provided weapons to the opposition forces that were there fighting the taliban. so far in libya, the u.s. is not saying we are doing that. the u.s. is not saying we are arming the rebels, but as i understand it, this presidential finding, if it has happened, would be the kind of instrument that president obama would use to authorize something like arming the rebels. again, i am not t
on japan where it remains, frankly. there is one other story, a story about the u.s. and terrorism that we as a show decided that it bears telling, even on this night with everything else going on in japan. we'll be back with that in a moment. [ robin ] quality and reliability are more than words here. it's personal. i have diabetes. so i'm proud to manufacture the accu-chek aviva meters and test strips here in the usa. and now we put a prescription discount card in every box so you'll pay no more than $15 on test strips, which is a true american value for people with diabetes like me. [ male announcer ] accu-chek aviva. born in the usa. should i bundle all my policies with nationwide insurance ? watch this. on one hand, you have your home insurance with one company. and on another hand, you have your auto with another. and on another hand, you have your life with another. huh... but when you bundle them all together with nationwide insurance... ... they all work together perfectly-- and you could save 25%. wow... it's all in the wrists. ♪ nationwide is on your side >>> there is an impor
humanitarian assistance to the libyan border region, including u.s. military aircraft to fly home foreigners who fled into neighboring tunisia but then got stuck there. today the refugees at this camp in tunisia passed the time by playing soccer. this was ghana versus nigeria. the country of spain flew some of the refugees, egyptians, home to cairo today. meanwhile, the violence the refugees have been fleeing has continued. in the central part of the country fighter jets again bombed the rebels today as the rebels and gadhafi's ground troops fought for control of brega's oil facilities. generally speaking, reports from libya indicate that rebels have been holding ground when gadhafi's forces have been trying to take that ground back. that is not a good sign for the dictator. when you are the dictator, when you're supposedly in charge and you pick a military fight with a leaderless resistance, that is a fight you should expect to win. but gadhafi has not been winning. the rebels appear to be mourning their dead when people are killed and then replacing them with even greater numbers of fighte
Search Results 0 to 5 of about 6 (some duplicates have been removed)